好英語網 - www.676827.live


Is full-time work bad for our brains?

Don’t do an IQ test after a full week’s work if you are 40 years or older. You could be disappointed.


If you’re over 40, working more than 25 hours of work a week could be impairing your intelligence, according to a study released in February by researchers for the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research in Australia. The team conducted reading, pattern and memory tests in more than 6,000 workers aged over 40, to see how the number of hours worked each week affects a person’s cognitive ability.


Working 25 hours a week (part time or three days a week) was the optimum amount of time spent working a week for cognitive functioning, while working less than that was detrimental to the agility of the brain for both men and women, the study found.


“Work can stimulate brain activity and can help maintain cognitive functions for elderly workers, the ‘lose it or use it hypothesis’,” said lead researcher Colin McKenzie, a professor of economics at Keio University in Tokyo.

“工作可以刺激大腦活動,還可以維持年齡較大員工的認知能力,正所謂‘用則進,不用則廢’”東京慶應義塾大學經濟學教授、這項調查的首席研究員科林·麥肯澤(Colin McKenzie)說。

“But at the same time, excessively long working hours can cause fatigue and physical and/or psychological stress, which potentially damage cognitive functioning.”


But why is age 40 the turning point for the mind?


According to McKenzie, our “fluid intelligence”, which is how well we process information, starts declining around the age of 20 and “crystallised intelligence”, or the ability to use skills, knowledge and experience starts decreasing after 30 years of age. McKenzie said that by age 40, most people perform less well at memory tests, pattern recognition and mental agility exercises.


As many countries have already increased their retirement ages, delaying when people are eligible to start receiving pension payments, McKenzie’s latest findings on cognitive fatigue are important.


“Work can be a double-edged sword, in that it can stimulate brain activity, but at the same time, long working hours and certain types of tasks can cause fatigue and stress which potentially damage cognition,” he said.


The science behind it


McKenzie’s findings suggest that although economics may now be forcing us to work much longer than in previous generations, biologically and emotionally our minds may not be designed for the stress and repetition of working nine-to-five, five days a week when we are over 40.


Previous studies have shown that workers of various ages doing overtime can suffer chronic stress, cognitive impairment and also mental illness. One 1996 study from the Boston University School of Public Health indicated that overtime work had adverse effects on the mental health of employees in the automobile industry, such as on the assembly line in a factory.


McKenzie’s research differs in that his team has found that such health and cognitive issues can occur at a much lower threshold than previously thought — that is, in people over 40 working a regular week, rather than doing overtime.


The negative effects of stress on the mind are well-documented in neurological research. Stress affects cognitive functioning primarily through hormones, in particular, steroid hormones and the stress hormone, cortisol, in the brain which in turn can affect short-term memory, concentration, inhibition and rational thought.


But there may be other factors at play as to why 40 seems to be a critical turning point.


McKenzie’s team is now looking into the driving factors behind their research such as the “sandwich years” when many adults have at least one person to look after, a child or an elderly parent, on top of working full-time.


That creates a job on top of a job, where the person rarely gets a break. According to the US National Alliance for Caregiving in a survey conducted last year a typical caregiver in the US is a 49-year-old employed female, currently caring for a 69-year-old female relative who needs care because of a long-term physical condition. She has been providing care for four years on average, spending 24.4 hours a week in a care role, on top of her work and other family responsibilities.

這便會在常規工作之外制造額外的任務,導致人們難以獲得休息時間。根據美國護理聯盟(National Alliance for Caregiving)去年進行的一項調查,美國目前典型的護理者是49歲的在職女性,照顧的對象則是69歲的老年女性——她們由于存在長期健康問題而不得不接受別人的照料。平均而言,典型的護理者處于這種生活狀態已經4年,需要每周抽出24.4個小時護理他人,另外還要肩負工作和家庭責任。

The sleep factor


Sleep also plays a role in being able to endure a full week of work. Until recently, high achievers often prided themselves on getting very little sleep. Former UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher used to say she could work effectively on only four hours sleep a night — though archive video footage captures her snoozing during the day. Arianna Huffington, editor in chief of the Huffington Post, claimed too she used to sleep around five hours a night until she realised it was bad for her health, now calling  sleep deprivation the “new smoking”.

睡眠質量也在一定程度上決定了人們能否忍受整整一周的工作。直到最近,短時間的睡眠還是成功人士引以為豪的事情。英國前首相瑪格麗特·撒切爾(Margaret Thatcher)曾經表示,她每天晚上只睡4個小時——但資料片曾經記錄下她白天打盹的畫面。Huffington Post總編輯阿利安娜·赫芬頓(Arianna Huffington)也曾經自稱每晚只睡5個小時,直到她意識到這樣對身體健康不利——她現在反而將睡眠剝奪稱做“新式吸煙”。

But how much sleep should one get? The US National Sleep Foundation recommends more than seven hours sleep a night for people over 26 years.


Learning and memory depend on sleep and recreation, according to Karl Ericsson, professor of psychology at Florida State University. McKenzie’s research isn’t dissimilar to Ericsson’s.

佛羅里達州立大學教授卡爾·埃里克森(Karl Ericsson)表示,學習和記憶都要依靠充分的睡眠和休息。麥肯澤的研究與埃里克森的說法不謀而合。

“Restful sleep is critical to high levels of performance,” Ericsson said.


One size doesn’t fit all


Ericsson’s research also supports McKenzie’s premise that a 40-hour week isn’t optimal for high performance. Ericsson’s research, however, isn’t age specific but rather looks at the total number of hours optimal per day, each week, for high performance.


“We found that expert performers engaged in practice for 21-35 hours per week but no more than three to five hours per day,” Ericsson said.


“Under complete freedom to work, these individuals did not spend more than those weekly totals, suggesting that this amount of effort was judged to be optimal for them.”


A need to work


It’s all well and good, however, to discuss how much better we would be if we worked less than a 40-hour week in an office, but for many people who need the income to survive, it’s not a viable financial option. Many over 40s also wouldn’t dream of working less than a 40-hour week, given the option, as they say it gives them a necessary stimulus, calling the research overblown.


Richard Salisbury, age 58, who lives in the Blue Mountains, west of Sydney in Australia is one of them. Having worked both part time and full time for himself and for companies in-house as an information technology manager, he rejects the notion that less is more.

58歲的理查德·薩里斯伯里(Richard Salisbury)居住在澳大利亞悉尼北部的藍山(Blue Mountains),他不僅為自己打工,還在一些企業擔任IT經理,但他并不認同這種“少即是多”的理論。


“In fact I found that I dealt with demands on my time more easily as I gained experience or just became older,” Salisbury said.


“I find the idea of a 25-hour threshold more than novel,” he said. “The vast majority of people with whom I worked had no noticeable impact on their cognitive ability by doing a 35- or 40-hour week.”


Penny Evans, a 50-year-old policy adviser at a charity in London, works four days a week now but used to work 25 hours a week at the same charity, is of two minds as to whether three days (25 hours a week) or four days a week is best for performance and anxiety.

50歲的本尼·伊萬斯(Penny Evans)在倫敦的一家慈善組織擔任政策顧問,她每周工作4天,但之前也曾經在這家慈善組織每周工作25小時。談到每周工作3天(或者總共25小時)還是4天對提升業績、減緩焦慮最為有利時,她則顯得不夠堅定。

“Three days a week is great for work-life balance, especially when you have children at home but you are likely to fall out of touch and possibly sidelined. Four days a week means I feel pretty much fully connected to my team but I have an extra day off that helps me deal with other responsibilities.”


The key, Evans said, is having flexibility. The stress of her job is manageable, she said, helped by fairly widespread acceptance in the sector that employees should leave the office by 18:00.


“But in terms of the ideal amount of hours at work each week, it is difficult to say. When young and wholly committed with minimal other responsibilities, I seemed to thrive on working flat out but not sure how that would feel nowadays with everything so incredibly fast with email and social media.”


Healthy work


In last year’s Britain’s Healthiest Company awards, that were supported by the University of Cambridge in the UK (which didn’t include NGOs), sports goods, pharmaceutical and IT companies that topped the list for healthiest companies. All allowed time away from the desk and the opportunity to stay physically healthy. For example, flexible hours at some of these companies allow employees to leave work early and some like Sweaty Betty provide exercise classes at lunchtime.

在劍橋大學去年評選的英國最健康公司中(不包括非政府組織),體育用品、制藥和IT企業位居前列。這些公司都允許員工離開辦公桌,從而獲得保持身體健康的機會。例如,某些公司可以通過靈活的時間安排讓員工提前下班,而Sweaty Betty還會在午休時間提供健身課。

But Carol Black, principal of Newnham College, University of Cambridge and chair of the Britain’s Healthiest Company Advisory Group that supports the awards, isn’t so sure that older workers need less contact hours a week to function well.

但劍橋大學紐納姆學院院長兼英國最健康公司顧問團主席卡羅爾·布萊克(Carol Black)并不確定,年齡較大的員工是否需要減少每周的工作時間才能獲得良好的工作表現。

In her view: “The most important thing about work is that it should be ‘good work’.  If it is good, it does not matter whether full-or part-time.”

上一篇: 美國到2015年將短缺醫生6萬
下一篇: 過去十年,關于健身運動我們知道了些什么


陕西快乐10分任4统计 全天赛车pk10免费计划 十一选五技巧中奖方法 智博彩通 湖北湖北快三一定牛 辽宁十一选五走势图表 江西时时彩交流群 甘肃11选5玩法 内蒙快3 内蒙古十一选五分布走势图 北京pk拾稳赚技巧5码